I've been using the 56 1.2 for a while and think it's the best Fuji lens to day when it comes to raw image quality. It's just amazing, even at wider apertures. I recently picked up the 16-55 2.8 after hearing about all of the great reviews about it's image quality and frankly, I'm not impressed. It's better than my 18-55, but not by much, and it's no where near the quality of my 56. So, is this just an unfair comparison or perhaps my copy of this lens has some issues? Thanks for any input!