X Trans vs OMD?? OK, so over at mu-43, there are all sorts of postings about how you can tell even at 1200 resolution that Fujis are better, etc. etc. etc. Frankly, it's making the place kind of depressing, with threads showing up like "will m43 survive to 2018" and "why did you choose m43, and will you stick with it." etc. Here's another person declaring Fuji is better. Why you choose M4/3 & will you stick with it? - Page 9 - Micro Four Thirds User Forum All sorts of declarations, and statements on what is obvious. Yet, no one's done a direct compare, with pics. ( I'm not talk brick walls, but maybe real landscape shots, or portrait shots. There's got to be OMD users here -- let's see how much better the Fuji's really are. I went to a camera store last week, and did test shots of an XE1 vs. my OMD, and while the XE1 squeaked out marginally better IQ, it wasn't "completely obvious" though store lighting is not great. I ran test shots last fall, and had the same conclusion, using a rented XE1 inside my kitchen. Someone said "sure, that kind of subject (still lifes in the house) won't show off the best of XTrans anyway." Maybe someone here can drive home the point? Show some real demonstration how Fujis are better? Maybe someone who knows how to post produce both file types to their max potential?